এই পাতাটির মুদ্রণ সংশোধন করা হয়েছে, কিন্তু বৈধকরণ করা হয়নি।
বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ দলিল : চতুর্থ খণ্ড
77
3. A local committee must be an operational unit and such a unit could be around 50 with about five activists in it and each activist carrying responsibility to look after at least five members of the group.
4. Such local committees should be registered with the central office of the Bangladesh Council and channel of communication on all matters of general interest should be direct. This arrangement is aimed to speed up operational efficiency. However, the representation of the local committees will have to be processed through respective regional committees where such committees are in existence or have become defunct.
5. For a local committee to have voting representation it must have on its role at least 100 paid-up members-the membership fee could be £12 per member per annum and the committee's minimum contribution to the central fund could be £1,000 per annum. A local committee should be accorded extra weightage in voting representation proportion to the additional financial contribution they would be making to the central fund.
6. For encouraging disciplined and coordinated activities the basic units could be regrouped in regional committees like (a) Glasgow & North; (b) Manchester & Lanes; (c) Leeds & Yorks.; (d) Birmingham & Midlands; (e) Bristol or Cardiff and South West England; (0 London & South East England. Delegates of the regional committees should constitute the Central Committee of the Bangladesh Council and the entire organisation to derive its authority from the National Conference of the Bangladesh Council which shall be convened as and when the Central Committee shall decide.
C. SPEAKING ABOUT ORGANISATIONAL TASKS
1. The biggest hurdle to the achievement of UNITY IN ACTION will be provided by the growing conflict between the established community leadership (produced during the last two decades of socio-welfare activities and mostly belonging to the elder generation who are somewhat retarded intellectually-though for no fault of theirs) and the newly emerging leadership of the local action committees (mostly young and educated but many suffering from impatience and intellectual arrogance). The established community leaders are understandably worried about the incursion of the new generation of the political activists. The newly emerging leadership on the other hand rightly feels exasperated when they find that their well-intentioned activities are blocked by parochial and factional coterie politics. Instead of seeing action, more action, and speedy action, the younger generation finds themselves wasting time in irrelevant debates and controversies. These two different types of leadership features will be very much apparent if one makes a comparative study of the style of work of two bodies in London, the Students' Action Committee or the Women's Committee and the London Action Committee. To compose these two distinctive trends into one composite stream is the most important and urgent organizational task before all of us who would like
