ᏙYᎪᏙᎪᏚᎢᎻᎪ< ᎠᎪᎡᎱᎪN Ꭺ 9 I. Kunja Behárí had four sons–Rám Ballahlı, Braja Ballablı, Jagat Ballabh, and Bhakta f itse” Iłallabh. --Ráin Bullahli, during the lifetime of his father, died leaving a widow named Golok "* * the vyavastai Mani, and Bhakta Ballabh died childles aster his father's death, leaving a widow named Blagavati. No. 2. The Dacia ("ourt of Appeal, after taking the opinion of the Hindu Law Officers, awar, led one third to the two daughsers of Jagut Billibh (to be shared between them equally.) an other third to Sháin Ballahh, son of Braja Ball...bli, and the remaining third to the widow Blagavatī, (bert to se her husloud had surrored his full, r) and declared (;olok Maiti entitled (ul to it shotre, but) to food and rainieut only brew us,’ her harsh wol loss, Bullahl had died before his father. This award was affirmed by the Suller Dewanny Alaw lut.—Ráy Sliya’īn Ballabli crosus Prán Krishna Ghos. 4th July 1S20. S. I). A. i?. Vol. III. p. :;:;. II. Ráın Keshab Ráy had three sons -- Rám Kumár Ráy. Rám Jíban Ríy, and Ráın Kamal J{4 y. of whı ·ı» 18 :ım K ıııın ir ،liw ·ıl withınııt isstıt». le:ıwiııg :ı, wiwlı •w Musst. P:ı İıı Maııi. Aftwor t!ıis İ{:ìrıı IX,>sh;i! , .li.-il. lv., v img his f w , rem;aining solis. Thi- l';uidit s leel:ur. * l th; ! tl11: right of R:iin Kum;ìr Roy to the property lost by his father Rául Keshab Riy was barrel by his laving died during his father's lif. , his widow therefore was not entitled to any share of the property of her d, ... asel husband's father : she however was entitled to receive uplintenance therefront, and to take by inheritain, 'luring lier life, any property of whici her husband had possession during his life. Th: Sulli, or ( 'ourt as or lingly lismissol l’adu Maui's claim, and levlared that the option of suillor the holders of the “state for maintenance was left to her. Musst. Heinlatá ( 'houlliurání App. 1lant ”, s"s Musst, l'ulu Al uni ( "houdhuráuí Respoulent.—1 kfh February 1825. S. I). A. R. Vi. I V. p. 1!). I I I. R in \I;i!ii ( 'lioiulli iurávi institute: 1 a -mit. :ml groundo, I hor el:iiin on that portion of the | ult rosthis of the Sud loor l'audit in a former appeal (preferred on the part of Musst. Heinlatá t 'hou:h:trání re, sus Mł u sst. l’adu Mlani ( "holellauríní, and det ideel on the 14th February, 1825, i. e. LLL LLLS LLLLL LLLS LLLLLL LLLLLLLL LL LLLS LLLL LLLLLL LLLL LLL LLLLLS 0 LLLLL LLLLL LLLLL LLL LLLL LLLLLLLL LLS StttttLLS LLLLSS LLS0LLLS LLL LLLLLLLLLL LLLLLS LLLLLLL LLLLLLLLS LLL LLLLLLL LLLLLLS LLLLS LLLLLLS L LLL o, as . . is they both diol before lor, she would take the lor, operty of both. If the mother li...I first, and then the two brothers, the sons of (their sister) Musst. Rán Mani, if the of sworrirrol sht in. would take their property, and “flee their leath, Rán, Miuri would succeed ther, to is the or loir. The Suiller ( 'our deterulined that the claim of the plaintiff was barrell by the l' wa rus/h.? given in the former cast and quoted by her, locause she had not a son alive a the time of her mother's de atlı, anul }m “:uno · lier brothers R:iii. Kainal :ıı 1e! Ránu ..! ilkin li:iol elitel lefore their niother.–Rín. Mlani ( 'hontılhurîııî t'ı u'sus ! lenırlatî ( 'htıudlıur.înıî. 6th January 1835. S. D. A. R. Vol. VI. լ. 3. 1 v. Islwer handra Kårfarna versus Gobinila ("handra Kirfirini. S. C. ("ons H. I. р. 74. See Manimohan Bose re, sus l'Oliarumani. 174 li November 1853. S. l.). A. R. 1. 91t). See also the vases quoted in the succession of failer's laughter's son. I. In the case of Adwaita Chánd Manilal and others, petitioners, the opinion of the Sudder { τιs" Court (present Tucker, Roid, and Tarlow, Judges) was, that the act of birth or of conception of an راe:Aruل لأن مهب ينت wyaw أنا وبلة heir in the womb was one and the same fling in the eye of the Bengal law, only that the birth of the N ئة . رب. infant must be awaited ; because, if the issue be a daughter, she would have no title ; if a son, he would inherit. 17th August 1843. 2. Sev. Cases, 131. Morley's Digest, Vol. i. p. 327. See the cases which respect the widow authorised to adopt, and the boy to be adopted by her: and which are quoted in the part treating of adoption.
