( & ) evidently conflicting systems of Hindu philosophy, tracing the origin to the Vedas. You have gone a step further ( and that a very important one in this age ) to show the points of agreement between the East and the West. Such books are badly waited to enrich the vernacular literature « If the countrA”. 5. Pandit M.A.N s HAN KAR I’ITAM IR AR DAs MiETA, -DErury VAIR A \R UM RAI.A, RAEHAwA):- . "I have read your second volume of the UPANISHADER Up.AIDEsH and given particula ittention to its, Introduction. I had never scen before si i very explicit exposition of the fundamental doctrine- of such är abstruse subject like Vedanta. The language is sweet. and simple, at the same time intelligible a once. You have carefully avoided wiat is called the Khatpat of Ghat-pat. Without making use of any abst use logical arguments, you have been able enough , ti i make Vividi : impressions of the nost intricate the ries of Vedant, philosophy on the mind of a reader. As you: :ave written, in the beginning of the introduction, the saya-lad of Sri Sankaracharyya has been never underst iod or rather. thisuilderstood both by his opponents and also by his modern admirers as well. Sankarachariya has never, advocated the extreme unreality Wii &isi) of this, phenomenal world;-what he wanted to say is tlıat it' is not so real as perceived through senses, It is qté different from what it appears to be aliud it is as if the shadow of the reality. You have very successfully. brought out the real meaning of the different writings
