5 לפי . সেই সময় জজ সাহেব ধীরে ধীরে যাহা বলিলেন তাই এই স্থলে উদ্ভূত না করিয়৷ থাকিতে পরিলাম না । “James Balfour Ogilvy—It is my painful duty to pass the sen. tence of this Court upon you. You have been found guilty of false imprisonment of the prosecutor Mr Shaw. (The learned judge then recapulated the facts of the case) The Darogah a most important witness, as to the acts of Shaw and the necessity for his restraint, was not ealled by 2ither party,+ why, I cannot understand, as he certainly could have given the best evidence as to what took place, and whether Mr Shaw was party to any disturbance or breach of the peace. But I must say that there is not a tittle of evidence to show that Mr Shaw was guilty of sedition, or any other offence दन्नम*न । (কীৰ্ত্তিক whatever. It is in evidence, that - he knew only of one perwanah being served on Pertaup. at Culua, and, I must say, that that occasion his conduct on appears to me to have been judicious, regular and proper. He made his client write a letter offering submission to the order of the authorities, and it was delivered to the Nazir that night. Mr Shaw so far from committing any improper acts, gave the best advice as to how to get rid of by telling the Nazir to point out who of the the ussembly, followers should be sent away. The treatment of Mr shaw after his arrest was certainly exceedingly harsh, and is without justi. fication either in law or in fact, and he was made೦. undergo by you most unwarrantable and most unjustifable imprisonment”
- कौश जडैन झाबू प्रख्Gग्राख् ब्रॉब्रlन नाrश्व अङ्गाम बनcन “थङा*$ारन ब्र ८माकদিম৷” “প্রভাপচাদের গ্রেপ্তার" বলিয়। উল্লেখ করিয়াছেন । কিন্তু কোম্পানীর DD BDDDDB B BBD DD DBBB BBB BBB BDD BDS BBDDS बऔरड इडेक, ब्राcब्र इकेक, ८थबांटन #उ*$ाएशन नाभ ऍ एझ१ कबिष्ठ इ३ब्राप्ए, cगथाrन ठtझाब sciः dissant Rajah <थक्लङि wच बलिग्न भिन्नt
সিতেছি । , চেলু । আমরাও । সেই 'छ?ोब्लास्ना' বলিয়।
