ԳԵ Հ বঙ্গভাষা ও সাহিত্য nation more about the indu mind and its attitude towards life than we ca, gather tre inn 5O volumnes of impressions of travel by lEuropeans. Lotis picturesque account of the rites practised in Travancore temples, and even M. Chevrillon's synthusis of much browsing in indu Scriptures, seem fair records by the side of this unassuming title of indu literature-Mr. Sen may well be proud of the lasting monument he has erected to the literature of his native Bengal.” From a long review in the .\T EN.EUM, March, 6, 1912-"Mr. S. may justly congratulate himselt to the fact that it the middle age to his clone more for the history of his national language and literature than any other Writer of his ( )wn or indeed any time.” mየ‛ lFrom a long review in the St’ (` I AT MIN, Julle l2, lo) l2-“\ book o extra(ordinary interest te i thosc \\ h i W, could nauke in 1m partill studly of tle lBuengal nentality und character – Werk Whicl reflectS the utin ) st Credit on tke Caud uur, inclustry and leari 'ng ( ot its autho br. l n t s kindl hy s book is, il masterpiccc-modest, learned, through and sympathotic. Perhaps no other man living has the let thing ind happy inclustry for the task he has successfully acCoin plished.” From a review by \IR. i. 31.V.R )(E in the Royal \sicic Society's Journal, Jan, lyl 2-'It is il v Cry full all it cristing account of the levelopmont ( if thec 13 cing, al literaturc, 1 loc haus au pow cir (, ) ! !; picturcs que Writing... h is (le scriptions are i often clo cint.” Iron a long review by S. K. RAI 1, il 1 l in India, London, March 15, 19 I2 -“There 1s no more compctc1}{ authority ( )1ì the subject tham Mr }}|Tì( b° chandil Sen. The great value of the b (k is in its lull and fresh treatinent of the pre-English cra and for this it would be difficult to give its author to high raise.” Fra in a long review by li. Kl. 13 N 1 in the Bijdrage of the Royal Institute for Tal ( translated by l)r. Ke'r llins: )—“lfruit of investigation carried through many years...highly into csting bi ok...the reviewer has all to admiro in the agus to the work, nothin'"; ti » Criticise. tor his w holc knowledge ! der ved from it." b t . M. em ){ From a review by DR. OIII NBF.K., in the Franklurter Zictung. Decem t 输 粤 ) DlU 3, 191 transiated by the lat: )r. Tibaut)-"It is an important sllP
