j v. II. III. 1V. DIGESTED INDEX. LXXXIII. Rungama (widow) for herself, and on behalf of Luellmeeputy Naidoo, Appellant, rersus At1 lima (widow,) Ramanadha Baboo, and Puttoory Cally Doss, Respondents, Atchma (wi. vow,) Appellant, rersus Ramanadha Baboo, Respondent. Privy Council Decision, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, and 30th Julie, and 1st, 2nd, and 3rd July, 1846.-Moore's Iudian .Appeals, vol. IV. pp. 89—113 .. 8 = } 始叙娜 g so * * 13, Ilobakaut Chowdhree, Appellant, tersus Kishenprin Dassea Chowdrain, guardian of Nub kant Chowdry, Respondent.-January 16th, 1838.-S. D. A. Rep. vol. Wi. p. 219. A man, though possessed of a son, grandson, or great-grandson, (in the male line) incapable of performing exeguial rites, or prolonging his lineage, has however a right to adopt a son, 经 ● * * * ● 哆 受多函 boast's notes, Case No. 10. March 24th, 1814, . & e ∈ 娜 * 冷 蟾 够 慢 咏 甸 S 岚 The existence of a daughter's son and the rest is no bar to the adoption of a son, and no ground to invalidate such adoption, if made 旁 龟 * 珍歌 余 ● A man, having adopted a boy, and that boy being alive and free from any legal defect, cannot adopt another.. 敏 拳 够 ● ● 鳍 ● 学徽 ● 鲇 Rungama (widow) for herself, and on behalf of Luchmeeputty Naidoo, Appellant, rersus Atchma (widow,) Ramanadha Baboo, and Puttoory Cally Doss, Respondents.-Atchma (widow,) Appellant, versus Ramamadha Baboo, Respondent.—Privy Council Decision, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, and 30th June, and 1st, 2nd, and 3rd July, 1846.-Moore's Indian Appeals, vol. IV, pp. 89—113. * * 哆● 受 & 4 * * a s 娜 峪 邻 射 Sham Chunder and Rooder Chunder, Appellants, versus Naraianee Debea and Rankishore Roy, Respondents—August 21st, 1807. S. 1). A. Rep. vol. I, p. 209 But although a man, having a legitimate son of the body or one adopted, or a son's son, or son's grandson, in the male line, alive and competent to fullil the object of having a son, cannot adopt another son, yet he can leave permission to his wife to adopt a son, in case the existing male issue die without having a son, (free from any of the legal defects, ) 像必 始 * # & Mussummat Soolukhna, widow of Soondernarain, deceased, Appellant, versus Ramdoolaul Pandey and others, Respondents, May 27th, 1811. S. D. A. Rep. vol. i. p. 324 Shan Chunder and Rooder Chunder, Appellants, cersus Narainee Dehea and Ramkissore Roy, Respondents.—August 21st, 1807.—S. D. A. Rep. vol. I. p. 209 .. - - - - The husband can authorise his wife to adopt a son, only when he is unabl himself to do so... 始 甲 » R A a s to * & * * East’s Notes, Casc No 10. March 24th, 1814 * в а 参 $ 逊 够 哆 领 幽 * Mussummat Soolakhtia, widow of Soonder Narain deceased, Appellant, rersus Rainduolaul Pandey and others, Respondents. May, 27th, 1811. S. D. A. Rep. vol. I. p. 324 Sham Chunder and Rooder Chunder, Appellants, versus Narainee Delica and Rankishore Roy. Respondents.-August 21st, 1807. S. D. A. Rep. vol. 1. p. 209 ... .. - Purmanund Bhuttacharjes, guardian of Krishennath Chowdhooree, minor, Appellant, rerous Woolmakaunt Lahooree and others, Respondents. November, 18th, 1828. S. D. A. Rep. vol. iv. p. 318 .. 净 曲 毫 峻 略 * 缘 象 * 8. w r. - - 诊 蛤强 8 阁 Bullabkant Chowdhooree, Appellant, rersus Kishenpria passea Chowdhooranee, guardian of Nulsant Chowdhoory, January 16th, 1838. S. D. A. Rep. vol. vi. p. 219 祭 影 A verbal authority to adopt is as valid as a written authority. . . East's Notes, Case No. 10. March 24, 1814 Α. Α. 娜姆 妙 ↔ 劍 • * * * A writing is not indispensably necessary for giving or receiving a son in adoption. Mussummat Soolukhna, widow of Soonder Naraen, Appellant, persus Ramdoulaul Pan dey and others, Respondents. May 27th, 1811. S. D. A. Rep. vol. I, p. 324 Page. 904,91 to s. St, * 8{I § S{}; S(; l. 904,914 {}(\{} 8Ꮾí; § {}{; {}{}{} S(;S 89 | 8:13 緣 莓{}() 雉#> {} ] § 郤8 89.4 8{}& 896 l’re,” “dent V'y avastha 排‘、H, vyavastiri. Pre:gden; v vavası ha oro, el at,
- *
V v tvasi ha !’roe, i, f.;,
- }
- 5
- 3
- *
\' ;t४:०..*६ I're, etfont v.v.t vastha {'rw r·i,·:· t.
