vyavasrał DARPANA. 1924 565. For as many days as impurity is contracted by a dataka Cr given son on the death of a particular person, for so many days does that particular person contract impurity on the death of the dataka; such is also the case with the dataka's son, grandson, and the rest. So this is the sum of it:—the offspring of a dottaka and the family of his natural father contract no impurity on the birth and death of each other. The adopter, his father, and paternal grandfather contract impurity for three days on the death of the dataka, and on the birth and death of his son, son's son, and the rest: so also do the dattaka and the rest on the death of those ancestors, and on the birth and death of their offspring. There is impurity for one day on the death of the sakullyast from the adopter's paternal great grandfather to the ten degrees" ascendant, and on the birth and death of their offspring: the impurity contrated on the birth and death (as the case may be,) of the saménodakast and swa-gotrast is removed immediately after bathing. Tho females of both sides contract impurity for the same period as the males in the same degree of affinity. 566. The duyámushyāyana contracts impurity in both families —his impurity extends to the full period on the birth and death of a member of the family of his natural father; and for three days on the birth and death of one belonging to the family of his adopter. 4. CLAUSE THREE-ON SRA'DDHAț, &c. The adopted son, as substitute for the real legitimate son, being the agent of rites performed by a legitimate son, it follows that he is performer of funeral repasts, the objects of which are the manes, in honor of whom a legitimate son performs such repasts. For:-without difference, relation to the father and other sires of the adopter obtains, in the same manner as relation to the general family, the whākhā (or branch of the veda,) the family-deity, and family-rules, of that person.-D. Mím. Seet. VI, § 58. - 567. The adopted son is to perform the adopter's funeral obsequies, the sixteen srāddhast commencing with the first and ending with the sapindi-karanaš, the ckoddishtai srāddha, and the pârvana|arāddha, &c. * what is the difference between him and another dattaka; consequently, it is proper to distinguish him. from other dettakes in respect of impurity, in the same manner as, by reason of propinquity, he is preferred to others in respect of adoption, Besides, from the ់ dictum of the suthor of &\s Dattaka-Minászó -'On the death of the adopter, the uncleanness of the adopted son, for ton days, is not fit, since the (general) relation of 笠 and connection by identity of family, associated together, are wanting in him: {D, Mim. Seet, WI 驻A)琳 that, in his opinion, a son adopted from one's own goors and sapiadas is to contract impurity for the full period. l -
- See the text of Marieli and the interpretation thereof in D. Miom, Sect. VIII. § 7, at seq. * ses asta, pp. 28s—389; 704 & 710, Nokes. -: r
3 &ios is an offering made to the manes of a deceased ancestor or other person at appointed times, “ . . . . . . . . . - TTTTTkS kCS kkS AAMMM MAAA AAAA LLLL A LLLLL AMS | See sate, p. 25, Note. 84 vyawsäwx. Wyawaatha”. Vyawustha.
