VYAVÄE A REÄRPANA. of Ośā " LL LL LLLLL LLMAeeS LL LLLLLLS LLLLL LL LLL LLLLLLLLS LAA AA LLLL LLLLLLS coa-Tahir send' stois solation to his smos, theosotha-deimiyosse. ‘Iasi, third, outi, at his gotiate his got smooths, the sands of the dow. на.--D. Ch. Sect. III, §. 13. , 4,” - கம்ப கண் மாண் விக்சல் : . of the maternal ancestors as of those of the patemalancestors. Let the issue of two fathers present (oblations) first to the natural father; but the same Authority. must be given (to him) last, (should he survive; the adoptive father) being dead. If both have died (together, the oblation must be given,) first to the natural father; after him, the present the same to the adoptive father. Should it not be first offered to the natural father, it does not endure.” Byಚಿನ್ತ, the performance of a párvana rite, by the son of both fathers, on the death of either even, is shewn. In the same manner, by parity of reason, where there may be a diversity of mothers, the sires of the natural mothers are first designated by a son, who is son to two fathers, at the funeral repast (suggested by the passage suljoined) in honor of the maternal grandfathers; subsequently, the sires of her, who is the adoptive mother—"Where the paternal sires are honored there certainly are the maternal.”—D. Ch. Sect. § 14, 15, 16. Clause Fourth.-Succession, &c. of Adopted Sons, 586. Deprived of the inheritance of his natural parents and their relations, an vania. adopted son is enttiled to inherit from his adoptive father." “A given son must never claim the family and estate of his natural father. The funeral Authority. cake follows the family and estate; but of him, who has given away his son, the obsequies fail?” (Mass.J-The son given must never claim his natural father's family, and estate. Thus ‘the obequies,'—that is, the funeral repast (which would have been) performed by the son given, fails of him, who has given away his son. The author of the Chandrikā thus explains: By this it is declared, that by the ot alone, creating the filial relation, property of the son given, in the state of his adopter, is established, and connection to him as belonging to the same family enus. But through extinction of the filial relation, from the mere gis, the property of the son giren, in the etse of the gireyi singuished, sad *tion with the family of the girer y annulled".-D. Mim. Sect, #6-8. o See •*, թ: 1018, Moste, # * stes, D, Ch, Beet, II.4 48-10, stwffs, p, 1914.”
