WYAWAS THA-DARPANA. i088 7. Accordingly, in the double set of oblations, it is indispensably necessary that the son should perform the Śrāddia of the paternal line, not for the line of his maternal grandfather: but it is simply reprehensiblesin one who performs the trāddha for the paternal aucestors, not to perform it also * maternal grandfather and his ຫຼogenitor?Consequently, since the aráddia may be performed without noticing the maternal grandfather's line in a subordinate double set of oblations, and the like, the trāddha for the maternal ancestors is not requisite to the completion of the obsequies performed in the dark fortnight of A swina. This observation of Ragsnandana and others is ocupte–Hid р. 258. 8, The better reason, therefore, perhaps is that the negensity of a son to celebrate the funeral rites regards the man, rather than the woman, who depends less for redemption upon such means, so that whenever a woman, duly authorised, adopts, it is on her husband's account, and for his sake, not her own.—Str. H. L. vol. I. p. 67. 596. The right of the relations of a different race, like those of the same race, to inherit from a dattaka, is, however, unquestionable. For there is no impediment to their succession to the property of a dattaka relation, the same not being prohibited by any authority. 597. If there exist a another son of the proprietor, then the adopted son of his deceased son will get such share as an adopted son would have been entitled to.” 698. Should there exist no son, the adopted son of the deceased Bon will tako the whole property.” 599. An adopted son's legitimately begotten son is entitled to an equal share with the legitimately begotten son of his adoptive grandfather; and on default of such uncle, he is entitled to the whole property. 600. The same rule is to be applied by inference to the great grandson also.D. Ch. Sect. V. § 25. For, the special rule is, that grandsons, whose father is dead, take such share (of the heritage) as would have devolved upon their other of the same description as themselves. ‘Since it is a restrictive rule, that a grandson succeed to the appropriate share of his own fathert, the son given, where his adopter is the real legitimate son of the paternal grandsather, is entitled to an equal share, even with a paternal uncle, who is also such description of son : therefore, a grandson, who is an adopted son, may (in all cases) inherit an equal share even with an uncle.”—This must not be alleged (as a general rule.) For there would be this discrepancy: if the father of the grandson were an adopted son, he would receive a fourth sharet, but the grandson, if he were such son (of him,) would receive an equal share (with an usole in
- Tbe origina, of these £wo Wyarey i4* is in £ae, Sanscrit Dattake-C\andrikã, bu* an* English version th is not to be found in Mr. Sutherland's translation of the work, and must have been inadvertently omitted,
- See ante, p. 26. t in Bengal, a third share: see ente, p. 1042,
Wyawas!há. Кeason, Wyawasthá. 3 # Jo Reason. Authority.
