vyavastha'.DARPkNa. 1144. (y) “An enemy to his father';-he who hates his father is an enemy to his hurr that is, he who threatens, or ill treats him during his life, and is averse from performing his obsequies when dead.–D. T. Sans. p. 20. See W. Da. Kra. Sang. p. 60. باقر : He who hates his father is a professed enemy to him: enmity is manifested by attempting his life and so forth; but after the death of the father, by withholding the libations of water and the like, wäiei eiowld be offered for his sake,—*oleb. Dig, Vol. III. p. 808. (r). Addicted to rice'; that is, addicted to any forbidden acts, such as slaughter or the like, and reprehensible means of subsistence.— See Ilid, p. 209. Kalloka-bhatta expounds “addicted to any vice,” devoted to gaming or the like. Other. explain it inclined to dissipate the wealth of the family.” Jintstarāhana interprets it averse from performing their father's obsequies, and other acts of religion.—Ibid, p. 300. • Addicted to vice,” committing acts which exclude persons from performing the obsequies and ther rites on the death of their ancestors:—that is, having carnal connection with such ஆ as are not to be so associated with.--Commentary on the 1/4yabhága, p. 1 18. See W. ра кr} Sang. p. 66. (i) Jagannātha, instead of Oupépatika' (expelled from society ) reads anapátrita' and thus expounds the term, A man formally expelled'; one banished with the ceremony of kicking down a water pot, for r crime on the third degree, such as killing a Kshatriya without malice or the like.---See Coleb. Dig. Vol. JII. p. }^;}. The author of the Prakasha, reading upuytisaki (a sinner in the third degree, ) instead of apapátrita,' explains it, guilty of crimes in the third degree.—See Ibid. Jimétarāhana and Raghunandana read oupapétika'; that likewise signifies guilty of crimes wn the third degree.—Ibid. A sinner in the third degree is only excluded from participation, in the ease of repeated offences: crimes are therefore mentioned in the plural number.—Ibid. p. 304 There are different kinds of leprosy, the most vile of them is that with ulcers discharging matter or blood, as declared in the Bhaliahya-purána, and sivádabhangèrnawa. Thus: Bhabutiya-purána —Hear, O priest the enumeration of various sorts of leprosy, the last worse than the first: blisters on the feet, a deformity in the generative organs, cutaneous fissures, true elephantiasis, ulcers, coppery blotches, black and (eighthly) white leprosy.—Among these, that leper is most vile, in respect of all religious acts, who is afflicted with ulcers on all his limbs, especially on his temples, forehead, and nose.--When he dies, let his corpse be cast near a sacred river, or other holy place, or at the root of a sacred tree; let not a funeral cake or libation of water be offered, nor let his corpse be burnt, nor obsequies be celebrated.—Should a man through affection burn the corpse of a leper, who has been six or even three months infected with the disease, that man must perform the lunar penance of an anchoret.-See Coleb. Dig. Vol III. p. 309. 114
