পাতা:সাহিত্য-সাধক-চরিতমালা তৃতীয় খণ্ড.djvu/৪০০

উইকিসংকলন থেকে
এই পাতাটির মুদ্রণ সংশোধন করা প্রয়োজন।

প্রতিষ্ঠায় সস্থান ళీ मश्रण छैशग्न थाठि ७२t चञानी छिन्न विदङ्ग क्र्मन क्लप्रिं★ ऐकूनिल छांवाङ्ग छैiइट्स ह्बत्न कtद्रन ४१: चैiझाँग्न अक्ट्रक ठकॉनैौड़न कtजब्र সৰ্ব্বশ্রেষ্ঠ সংস্কৃতজ্ঞ পণ্ডিত ম্যাক্সমুলারের প্রশস্তির উল্লেখ করেন । বস্তৃত্বটির স্বংশ-বিশেষ নিয়ে উদ্ভূত করিতেছি : Dr. Rajendralain Mitra, whose voluminotis works I only wish that I could study and understand, / There is no European Society of Oriental scholars to whom he is not honorably known, and there era many who have been glad to admit him as a member and a coiieague, He has thrown light ou mauy a dark corder of the history antiquities and language of this contry. But I am only repeating at secondhand what others have told ...ie, and it will be intro satisfactory is I read the very words written and published of him by ot:e of the greatest of living Sanskrit scholars. With referenee to an important phiiologieal diservery of Dr. Rajendralala Mitra, Professor Max Muller has spoken thris : ‘He is a pandit by profession, but he is, at the same time, a scholar and critic in our sense of the word. He has edited Sanskrit toxic after a tarefui colintion of M83., and, in his various contributions to the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, he has proved himself completely above the prejudices of his class, freed from the erroneous views of the history and literature ei India in which every Brahman is brought up, and thoroughly imbued with those principles of criticism which men like , Colebrooke. Lassen and Burnout have followed in