18 11 Act XXIX 1820 Reb Y Suh l} Art 8 Note Rule regulating the course of procedure in the event of a decree holder transferring his decree to another party ( \రి(re } 3rd Has the Court no power to appoint an Ameen to give possession, with larger allowances than 12 Annas per diem, however extensive the lands may be, and however important the duty? The reply to the 1st and 2d questions was in the affirmative, and to the third in the negative , Calcutta Court, 13th May, Western Court, 3d June, 1842
- ே
No 1338 On a reference from the Officiating Session Judge of Mymensing, whether under the rule of Class 2, Section 2, Regulation II 1832, which prescribes that in cases of burglary and thefts, unattended with personal violence, the inquiry is optional and rests with the injured party, such party is notwithstanding bound to give notice of the burglary to the police It was held, that the party suffering the injury is not bound by the law to make any report of the kind referred to, unless he should be a Zumeendar, and have to report the occurrence in that capacity Calcutta Court, 13th May, Western Court, 10th June, 1842 No 1339 On a reference from the Judge of Allahabad, relative to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of Act XXIX 1841, to the Moonsiffs' Courts, in the stage of a case prior to the filing of the answer —The Courts of Sudder Dewanny Adawlut were of opinion that the Act in question must be held applicable in supersession of Construction 758 and that no suit can be struck off on default prior to the filing of the answer, before the expiration of six weeks Western Court, 18th May, Calcutta Court, 10th June, 1842 No 1 340 Held, on a reference from the Judge of Meerut, that in suits for fractional por tions of Malgoozarae estates, the valuation according to the note at Article 8, Schedule B Regulation X 1829, is to be computed on a portion of the Jumma of the entire estate corresponding with the fractional share sued for, and not, as has been the erroneous practice in some districts, according to the estimated selling price –Thus, for instance, if the suit be for a four Anna share of an estate, assessed at 1000 Rs and within the range of the perpetual settlement, the valuation will be 750 Rs or three times the Jumma (250 Rs) of the fractional portion Western Court, 18th May Calcutta Court, 17th June, 1842 No 1341 Held, on a reference from the Judge of Futtehpore, that in the event of A, endorsing over a decree passed in his favour to B it 14 essential to the formal recognition by a Civil Court of such a transfer, that A, the transferring party should certıfy ın person or by Mookhtar appoınted for that specıal purpose, cither verbally or by petition, his having made the transfer to B, whose name
- should then be inserted, in place of that of e original decree-holder, in the
execution of decree process Western Court, 20th May, Calcutta Court, 17th June, 1842 NOTI ICATION বিজ্ঞাপন । APPOINTMENT BY THE SUDDER DE- সদব দেওয়ানী আদালতেৰ নিযোগ । W ANNY ADAW LUT The 1s1 July, lo42 ১৮৪২ সাল । ১ জুলাই । Moulvy Abdool Hossein, Moonsiff of Sundeep, to সন্দ্বীপেৰ भूमध्गक अिीपूङ cशोकनदी আবদুল হুসেন he Moonsist of Bhojpoor, Zillah Chittagong জিলা চাটিগাৰ ভোজপুরেৰ মুনসেফ হইরেন । J HAwkINs, Register জে হকিল । রেজিষ্টৰ । গবর্ণমেন্ট গেজেট ১৮৪২ । ১২ জুলাই ]
