1841 Act \\IX 1816 Reg XV 1839 Act \ \V II Sec 2 Ꮯuw Ꮯt ('ir ()rd V ol III No 177 ( ৩৪৮ ) previous possession without any reference to the Zemundar's plea of their rights as land-holders It occurs to me that if these cases came under the description of those contemplated by the enactment, they should have been governed by Section 10 of the Act, and instead of the Zemindars being dispossessed, they should have been retained in the management of their estates, and the party desirous of ousting them from their undoubted privileges referred to the Court for a title to do so As the case stands the land holders who possess the right of attachment and ejectment, have been referred to the Court for authority to exercise a power which in virtue of their position they already possess This surely could not have been the intention of the Act, which, if I understand its meaning correctly, leaves still, as heretofore, all points involving the question, whether the landholder has justly exercised his power, to be decided under the Regulations, which grant him, under certain restfictions, the power of distraint and ejectment (Signed) Ꭱ Ᏼ ᎷOᎡᏀᎪN Held, that the view taken in the above Letter, in regard to the Magistrate not possessing Jurisdiction in cases of the nature mentioned, was correct Western Court, 15th April, Calcutta Court, 27th May, 1842 を 一 விரு No 1334 With advertence to that part of Act XXIX of 1841, which makes the Institution of a new appeal, after dismissal on default under Suction 1, conditional on the party not being precluded by “lapse of time and period of appeal "--It was held on a reference from the Judge of Furruckabad, that the law being general, refers to all appeals, and that consequently, if an appellant to the Zillah Judge default under Act XXIX 1841, and his case is, in accordance with its provisions struck off, his appeal is lost too Western Court, 15th April, Calcutta Court, 27th May, 1842 No 1335 Held on a reference from the Judge of Moradabad, that the provisions of Regulation XV 1816, are applicable to Native Officers and Soldiers of irregular Corps on service in Afghamstan that is on foreign service Western Court, 28th April, Calcutta Court, 20th May, 1842 ? & No 1336, A suit instituted in Zillah Bhagulpore having been transferred to Zillah Purneah under the provisions of Section 2, Act XXVII of 1838, and by the Judge of the latter district referred to his Sudder Ameen for trial —It was held, on a reference from the Judge of Purneah, that the appeal from the Sudder Ameen's deension will be to the Purneah and not to the Bhagulpore Zullah Court Calcutta Court, 13th, and Western Court, 27th May, 1842 朝 No 1337 The following questions were submitted by the Judge of Tipperah, with reference to the Court's printed Circular Order No. 177, dated 31st December 1841, (Western Court 17th January 1842,) relative to the duties and remuneration of Ameens 1st When the measurement of lands, in addition to other local enquiries, becomes necessary, may the Court appoint a Mohunnr and a Nullee or Nullets, suborunate to the Ameen, with allowances not exceeding those of the Ameen, but ın addıtıon thereto ? 2d In giving possession of lands, so extensive as to render it impossible for one Ameen to complete the duty within a moderate period, may the Court ap point an Assistant or Assistants on separate allowances, not exceeding those of the Ameen” গবর্ণমেন্ট গেজেট ১৮৪২। ১২ জুলাই ]
